The National Center for Public Policy and Higher Education released the Measuring Up 2008 report today. Notably, the report highlights that higher education in the United States is still too expensive, showing that 49 states failed in affordability.
Here is a link to:
Full Report
Maryland highlight
11.21.2008
Mandating Healthcare for College Students?
In absense of universal access to healthcare, policymakers are considering mandated health insurance for college students in Maryland. Lead advocate Delegate Pena-Melnyk (D-PG County) explains that the estimated increased cost of healthcare is not a "deal-breaker" for affordability of higher education. DelmarvaNow.com highlighted a forum on the issue in an article.
Initial estimates claim that healthcare for college students would add an additional $1000 to the cost of tuition. Those whose parents have healthcare could exempt from the plan. Right now, policies vary across different institutions. At UMBC and Salisbury, students can choose to purchase healthcare through the campus, but are not required to have healthcare to attend school or live on campus. At the University of Baltimore, students must have healthcare to attend school full-time. At UMES, students are all charged for a minimal fee for the health center that covers basic care (students can exempt out of this fee if they show proof of healthcare). Additionally, college athletes and international students must have health coverage.
While healthcare is important, even health advocates in higher education put student insurance low on the priority list, behind sex education and immunization, according to Andy Clark of the USM.
Personally, I believe that the requirement is unnecessarily prohibitive for college students to attend institutions of higher education. The only case in which the university should consider requiring health insurance is in the case in which order and safety on campus is significantly at risk in the absence of healthcare for students. College athletes and international students would fall into this classification. It might also be reasonably argued that on-campus students should have coverage, although I would not currently advocate this point.
With that said, should such a requirement be added to the cost of higher education, the cost should be included in the calculation of "cost of education" used for financial aid purposes. Universities should also focus their collective efforts on providing more affordable optional health coverage for students.
With the expected rise in tuition rates, advocates concerned with accessibility in higher education should focus efforts on recruiting and retaining college students by mitigating college costs, not adding to them.
Initial estimates claim that healthcare for college students would add an additional $1000 to the cost of tuition. Those whose parents have healthcare could exempt from the plan. Right now, policies vary across different institutions. At UMBC and Salisbury, students can choose to purchase healthcare through the campus, but are not required to have healthcare to attend school or live on campus. At the University of Baltimore, students must have healthcare to attend school full-time. At UMES, students are all charged for a minimal fee for the health center that covers basic care (students can exempt out of this fee if they show proof of healthcare). Additionally, college athletes and international students must have health coverage.
While healthcare is important, even health advocates in higher education put student insurance low on the priority list, behind sex education and immunization, according to Andy Clark of the USM.
Personally, I believe that the requirement is unnecessarily prohibitive for college students to attend institutions of higher education. The only case in which the university should consider requiring health insurance is in the case in which order and safety on campus is significantly at risk in the absence of healthcare for students. College athletes and international students would fall into this classification. It might also be reasonably argued that on-campus students should have coverage, although I would not currently advocate this point.
With that said, should such a requirement be added to the cost of higher education, the cost should be included in the calculation of "cost of education" used for financial aid purposes. Universities should also focus their collective efforts on providing more affordable optional health coverage for students.
With the expected rise in tuition rates, advocates concerned with accessibility in higher education should focus efforts on recruiting and retaining college students by mitigating college costs, not adding to them.
11.17.2008
Salisbury Student Lend a Hand to Community
This past weekend, Salisbury students reached out to community members through a "We Love Salisbury" day. Students worked together with community members to rake leaves, do yardwork, and cleanup lawns. Afterwards, community members and students joined together on campus for a barbeque.
The event is part of an effort by the SU SGA to develop strong relations with the Salisbury community, one that has been strained in past years.
(Read the article highlighting the event DelmarvaNow.com newspaper)
The event is part of an effort by the SU SGA to develop strong relations with the Salisbury community, one that has been strained in past years.
(Read the article highlighting the event DelmarvaNow.com newspaper)
USMSC Meeting, November 16
The USM Student Council met yesterday at Towson to discuss a number of issues. Here is a link to my report to the Council.
The Council discussed a number of issues including:
I also asked the Council to research and consider a number of issues:
The Council will meet next at UMBC on December 7 to consider candidates for student regent.
The Council discussed a number of issues including:
- the impact of decreased state budget revenues on operating budgets for institutions
- efforts to proactively address illegal filesharing on campuses in order to avoid over-regulation by the federal government and/or music industry
- advocacy/lobbying plan for the Spring session
- Annapolis 101- lobbying day for students with the state legislature
I also asked the Council to research and consider a number of issues:
- differential tuition by discipline
- differential tuition increases/decreases for each institution
- mid-year tuition increases
- mandatory healthcare
- in-state tuition for undocumented immigrants
The Council will meet next at UMBC on December 7 to consider candidates for student regent.
11.14.2008
Higher Education Finances and What to Expect
Inside Higher Education highlights broad-based budget cuts across the nation. Salisbury President Janet Dudley-Eshbach warns of furloughs and mid-year tuition increases. The Chronicle of Higher Education highlights expert analysis of the tough consequences for higher education in the expected recession over the next two to three years.
The economy is in poor shape, and higher education will suffer. Fiscal pressures will come from a variety of areas:
- decreased state funding support for the operating and capital, due to declining state revenues
- decreased enrollments because of a lack of income and access to loans (both potential and current students); resulting in decreased tuition receipts
Undoubtedly, the more states cut their budgets, the more higher education will be cut. And so, to offset these lost revenues, higher education institutions will be pressured to either cut expenditures and services or significantly raise tuition. Each institution will likely work to balance the two budget-balancing strategies in the way to maintain prestige/quality and accessbility/affordability.
Next month, the Maryland Board of Revenue Estimates will examine the expected revenues for the next fiscal quarter for FY09. Possibly, the Board will identify the need to cut more from the budget. Do recall, the state experienced budget cuts amounting to around $350 million after the last revenue estimates were evaluated (higher education saw a $35 million cut, or 10%). Surely, with the further downturn in the economy over the past few months, we could expect more cuts.
A few things to consider:
- higher education occupies about 21% of the discretionary portion of the state budget (the portion of the budget that is not prescribed through legislative mandate)
- higher education saw 10% of the last round of budget cuts
- higher education is often seen as a non-essential expenditure
So, I presume that while Governor O'Malley has consistently provided significant financial support for higher education, he will be pressured more and more through fiscal realities to significantly cut higher education. In other words, the more money that is cut from the budget in Maryland, higher education will likely recieve an increasing percentage of the budget cut.
So then what happens? Tuition increases or service cuts. Take your pick. This can play out in a few ways:
- mid-year tuition increases
- larger class sizes
- decreased course offerings
- furloughs for staff
- hidden student fees and surcharges
- closed and limited student services (i.e. early closing hours for library)
- decreased and enveloped financial aid
- increased prices on campus sales (i.e. food, textbooks, t-shirts, etc.)
- fewer student job opportunities
- fewer research opportunities
- less research time for faculty
So, what are you willing to sacrifice? How do you suppose me and other policy makers balance affordability and quality?
The economy is in poor shape, and higher education will suffer. Fiscal pressures will come from a variety of areas:
- decreased state funding support for the operating and capital, due to declining state revenues
- decreased enrollments because of a lack of income and access to loans (both potential and current students); resulting in decreased tuition receipts
Undoubtedly, the more states cut their budgets, the more higher education will be cut. And so, to offset these lost revenues, higher education institutions will be pressured to either cut expenditures and services or significantly raise tuition. Each institution will likely work to balance the two budget-balancing strategies in the way to maintain prestige/quality and accessbility/affordability.
Next month, the Maryland Board of Revenue Estimates will examine the expected revenues for the next fiscal quarter for FY09. Possibly, the Board will identify the need to cut more from the budget. Do recall, the state experienced budget cuts amounting to around $350 million after the last revenue estimates were evaluated (higher education saw a $35 million cut, or 10%). Surely, with the further downturn in the economy over the past few months, we could expect more cuts.
A few things to consider:
- higher education occupies about 21% of the discretionary portion of the state budget (the portion of the budget that is not prescribed through legislative mandate)
- higher education saw 10% of the last round of budget cuts
- higher education is often seen as a non-essential expenditure
So, I presume that while Governor O'Malley has consistently provided significant financial support for higher education, he will be pressured more and more through fiscal realities to significantly cut higher education. In other words, the more money that is cut from the budget in Maryland, higher education will likely recieve an increasing percentage of the budget cut.
So then what happens? Tuition increases or service cuts. Take your pick. This can play out in a few ways:
- mid-year tuition increases
- larger class sizes
- decreased course offerings
- furloughs for staff
- hidden student fees and surcharges
- closed and limited student services (i.e. early closing hours for library)
- decreased and enveloped financial aid
- increased prices on campus sales (i.e. food, textbooks, t-shirts, etc.)
- fewer student job opportunities
- fewer research opportunities
- less research time for faculty
So, what are you willing to sacrifice? How do you suppose me and other policy makers balance affordability and quality?
11.13.2008
MHEC Hearing in State Plan on Higher Education, Nov. 19
On November 19, a public hearing on the State Plan for Higher Education will be hosted by the Maryland Higher Education Commission. The Maryland Higher Education Commission serves as the coordinating body of higher education in the State, guiding community colleges, private institutions, and public institutions. Check out the MHEC website announcement and the draft document up for comment.
11.03.2008
Advocacy Best Practices: UMCP SGA's "Take Action" Site
UMCP SGA has developed a "Take Action" website designed to provide students with opportunities to advocate, information about current events and issues, and links to useful resources. The website is part of President Sachs' efforts to engage students in advocacy efforts across the university.
The website includes three white papers on The Purple Line, Textbooks, and Tuition Policy. The papers provide great information in a succinct manner.
Kudos Jonathan and the rest of the SGA at UMCP!
The website includes three white papers on The Purple Line, Textbooks, and Tuition Policy. The papers provide great information in a succinct manner.
Kudos Jonathan and the rest of the SGA at UMCP!
10.31.2008
Become the Next Student Regent
It's that time of year, already. Time to find my replacement! Here is some information that you might find useful:
Position Description
Application
Each year, students from across the system compete for the position. Here is a brief overview of the process:
1. Students express interest, contact Vice President of Student Affairs at their campus and compete in an "institutional" selection process, if there is more than one person interested
2. By November 26, the President of each institution must submit their nominee (maximum 1 candidate from each degree granting institution, maximum 11 candidates)
3. The USM Student Council interviews candidates on December 7, and will likely select the three top candidates. In the form of a letter, the names will be forwarded to Chancellor Kirwan.
4. Chancellor Kirwan will interview candidates, and barring no major concerns, will forward the USM Student Council's recommendations to the Governor's Office of Appointments (usually occurs in January)
5. The Governor's Staff reviews the nominees and makes a selection sometime between February and June 30th.
If you have questions about the process or the position, please feel free to contact me by phone (410) 294-8581 or by email joshmichael@umbc.edu.
Position Description
Application
Each year, students from across the system compete for the position. Here is a brief overview of the process:
1. Students express interest, contact Vice President of Student Affairs at their campus and compete in an "institutional" selection process, if there is more than one person interested
2. By November 26, the President of each institution must submit their nominee (maximum 1 candidate from each degree granting institution, maximum 11 candidates)
3. The USM Student Council interviews candidates on December 7, and will likely select the three top candidates. In the form of a letter, the names will be forwarded to Chancellor Kirwan.
4. Chancellor Kirwan will interview candidates, and barring no major concerns, will forward the USM Student Council's recommendations to the Governor's Office of Appointments (usually occurs in January)
5. The Governor's Staff reviews the nominees and makes a selection sometime between February and June 30th.
If you have questions about the process or the position, please feel free to contact me by phone (410) 294-8581 or by email joshmichael@umbc.edu.
10.30.2008
Textbook Affordability Summit, November 24
Former USM student leader elected to prominent state role
Former USM Student Council Chair, Brian Bailey (UMBC '07), was recently elected to serve as the Chairman of the Baltimore County Democratic Party. Brian will serve as Chairman of the party for the remaining two years of the 2006-2010 term.
Brian had a celebrated tenure at UMBC and with student leadership in Maryland. He served as the Director of Community and Governmental Affairs for the UMBC SGA for three years, the Vice Chair of the USM Student Council (2005-2006), and as the Chair of the USM Student Council (2006-2007). He also interned as a lobbyist for Capitol Strategies, LLC. Additionally, he was heavily involved in Paula Hollinger's Campaign for Congress, District 3.
Expect to see Brian's name in coming years in decades in the forefront of Maryland politics...
Brian had a celebrated tenure at UMBC and with student leadership in Maryland. He served as the Director of Community and Governmental Affairs for the UMBC SGA for three years, the Vice Chair of the USM Student Council (2005-2006), and as the Chair of the USM Student Council (2006-2007). He also interned as a lobbyist for Capitol Strategies, LLC. Additionally, he was heavily involved in Paula Hollinger's Campaign for Congress, District 3.
Expect to see Brian's name in coming years in decades in the forefront of Maryland politics...
10.29.2008
Tuition Trends Up, Financial Aid to Fall
The College Board reported today on increases in tuition above rates of inflation. It explained that tuition has raised on average 6.4% at public four-year institutions. In response, the American Council of Education (ACE) stated that conditions are such that families should expect increases in tuition levels and decreases in financial aid, as highlighted in the Washington Post.
Maryland might be in a better situation than most states because of Governor O'Malley's expressed support for maintaining affordability at USM institutions.
Maryland might be in a better situation than most states because of Governor O'Malley's expressed support for maintaining affordability at USM institutions.
10.28.2008
HBCU Funding Report
The Commission to Develop the Maryland Model for Funding Higher Education, commonly referred to as the "Bohanan Commission" presented the final draft of the contracted report on funding for historically black colleges and universities (HCBUs) in Maryland. The four HBCUs in Maryland are University of Maryland, Eastern Shore, Coppin State University, Bowie State University, and Morgan State University. All but Morgan are member institutions of the University System of Maryland.
The report highlights studied undergraduate education, graduate education, and capacity of facilities within its report. Generally, the report found that HBCUs need more funding and support if they are to maintain their unique "dual mission" of 1) serving disadvantaged student populations, and 2) maintaining and expanding high quality academic programs. The report defines the standard of measure to me "similarity of outcomes," meaning that funding guidelines should be established to assist HBCUs to reach similar graduation rates, retention rates, and attainment levels.
After a cursory review of the report, I had a few concerns. First, I disagreed with the assessment that HBCUs should take the primary role in serving disadvantaged students, over community colleges (pages 6 and 7). We must ask whether students who are not ready for four-year college after high school should be remediated in public four-year institutions at a high cost, or at community colleges which are in the business of remedial and supplementary education. I do believe, though, that HBCUs play a prominent role in partnership with community colleges in serving disadvantaged students, possibly through expanded 2+2 program partnerships.
I also was struck by the expectation that HBCUs serve as both access and high quality institutions. From my perspective, most all other institutions fall on the spectrum of access and high-quality, atleast across Maryland. In other words, top-notch academic programs in Maryland are often housed at more rigorous institutions such as UMCP, Salisbury, and UMBC. More access oriented institutions, such as Frostburg, UMUC, and UB (undergrad), focus more on supporting students in their academic tenure. I question whether delineation of focus for HBCUs might be a more worthwhile approach. In other words, should not Morgan and UMES focus on high rigor academic programs, and Bowie and Coppin focus more on broad access, or some other more fitting arrangement..
Another issues of concern to me in the report is the lack of conversation about the political and decision-making structure of higher education in Maryland. The report highlights a lack of strategic planning for Morgan in the State (page 19), but makes no mention of its independent governing structure outside of the University System of Maryland. The report also neglects to address the lack of political independence of the "coordinating arm" of higher education, in which the Secretary of Higher Education reports directly to the Governor and not the Maryland Higher Education Commission.
Finally, I found the lack of detail regarding specific funding levels surprising. While some mention is found in the appendix of funding levels from the state and from tuition, the lack of study on this issue is concerning. The premise of the report is that more money is needed to make outputs more equitable; yet, the report simply assumes that more money will solve the problem. The report talks very little of the impact that increased funding has had on HBCUs in advancement over the past two decades. Possibly such an analysis would lead to meaningful suggestions as to how much more money is needed to raise outcomes at HBCUs.
For those interested in learning more about what the Supreme Court has to say on these issues, check out US. v. Fordice (1992) (full text / Oyez Summary). Also, see the article highlighting the report in the Baltimore Sun today.
The report highlights studied undergraduate education, graduate education, and capacity of facilities within its report. Generally, the report found that HBCUs need more funding and support if they are to maintain their unique "dual mission" of 1) serving disadvantaged student populations, and 2) maintaining and expanding high quality academic programs. The report defines the standard of measure to me "similarity of outcomes," meaning that funding guidelines should be established to assist HBCUs to reach similar graduation rates, retention rates, and attainment levels.
After a cursory review of the report, I had a few concerns. First, I disagreed with the assessment that HBCUs should take the primary role in serving disadvantaged students, over community colleges (pages 6 and 7). We must ask whether students who are not ready for four-year college after high school should be remediated in public four-year institutions at a high cost, or at community colleges which are in the business of remedial and supplementary education. I do believe, though, that HBCUs play a prominent role in partnership with community colleges in serving disadvantaged students, possibly through expanded 2+2 program partnerships.
I also was struck by the expectation that HBCUs serve as both access and high quality institutions. From my perspective, most all other institutions fall on the spectrum of access and high-quality, atleast across Maryland. In other words, top-notch academic programs in Maryland are often housed at more rigorous institutions such as UMCP, Salisbury, and UMBC. More access oriented institutions, such as Frostburg, UMUC, and UB (undergrad), focus more on supporting students in their academic tenure. I question whether delineation of focus for HBCUs might be a more worthwhile approach. In other words, should not Morgan and UMES focus on high rigor academic programs, and Bowie and Coppin focus more on broad access, or some other more fitting arrangement..
Another issues of concern to me in the report is the lack of conversation about the political and decision-making structure of higher education in Maryland. The report highlights a lack of strategic planning for Morgan in the State (page 19), but makes no mention of its independent governing structure outside of the University System of Maryland. The report also neglects to address the lack of political independence of the "coordinating arm" of higher education, in which the Secretary of Higher Education reports directly to the Governor and not the Maryland Higher Education Commission.
Finally, I found the lack of detail regarding specific funding levels surprising. While some mention is found in the appendix of funding levels from the state and from tuition, the lack of study on this issue is concerning. The premise of the report is that more money is needed to make outputs more equitable; yet, the report simply assumes that more money will solve the problem. The report talks very little of the impact that increased funding has had on HBCUs in advancement over the past two decades. Possibly such an analysis would lead to meaningful suggestions as to how much more money is needed to raise outcomes at HBCUs.
For those interested in learning more about what the Supreme Court has to say on these issues, check out US. v. Fordice (1992) (full text / Oyez Summary). Also, see the article highlighting the report in the Baltimore Sun today.
10.23.2008
Students consider more affordable options for college
The Christian Science Monitor highlighted in an article today that 6 in 10 potential college students are considering more affordable options for college. Also, 14% of surveyed students are focusing on a 2-year college route because of the economy, and 16% are abondoning the idea of attending college for the time being.
How as the economy affected your decision on coming to college or persisting in your enrollment? How about your friends?
How as the economy affected your decision on coming to college or persisting in your enrollment? How about your friends?
Student Response to Slots
Students across the USM are responding in a variety of ways to representative student groups taking positions on Referendum Question 2 on the Maryland ballot authorizing slots.
Has any of this impacted your vote on question 2?
- The Towson Towerlight highlighted student discontent from the Black Student Union and other groups in a recent article.
- The Diamondback highlighted in an article today the inaction, despite action by other student groups, of the UMCP SGA.
- The Retriever Weekly highlighted the SGA's action in an article and opinion piece.
- The UMBCUnderground Blog discussed the SGA's position a few days ago in a post discussion
- The USM Student Council endorsed the referendum (6-1-4) in a letter to Chancellor Kirwan.
Has any of this impacted your vote on question 2?
10.16.2008
Oakland Project Approved at UMCP
The Board of Public Works reconsidered and approved a "public", on-campus housing project called Hall. The complex will house around 650 students, who will mostly be underclassmen. The rooms will be in traditional residential hall style.
Funding for the project comes from UMCP's "cash-on-hand" fund balance. The USM has made it a practice to not approve such expenditures, but made a compromise with UMCP on this specific project. UMCP is concurrently pursuing other "public-private" and private housing arrangements to deal with the housing shortage. The complex will cost, in total, around $80 million.
Briefly, here are the different types of residential living funding arrangements:
Funding for the project comes from UMCP's "cash-on-hand" fund balance. The USM has made it a practice to not approve such expenditures, but made a compromise with UMCP on this specific project. UMCP is concurrently pursuing other "public-private" and private housing arrangements to deal with the housing shortage. The complex will cost, in total, around $80 million.
Briefly, here are the different types of residential living funding arrangements:
- public- completely funded by state dollars; management is run by the University, usually through Residential life
- public-private partnership- the university divides responsibilities with a third party, including funding of the project, management of the construction,ownership of the land, and management of the building and property
- private- all matters controlled and operated by a third party
10.15.2008
Budget Cuts Finalized; $35.4 million cut for USM
Governor O'Malley brought a final list of budget cuts to the Board of Public Works today. Among cuts, the Governor cut the state contribution for the University System of Maryland by 1.5%, totalling $15.6 million. Notably, the USM also recieved a $20 million cut from its general fund. Other cuts in Higher Education include:
- Community College Local Aid- $8.2 million
- Maryland Higher Education Commission Operations and Scholarships- $8.9 million
10.14.2008
Budget Woes in Maryland
Budget revenues are down in the state as a result of a faltering economy, and so the Governor is considering mid-year fiscal 2009 budget cuts. Governor O'Malley will propose approximately $300 million in budget cuts. The Sun has highlighted a list of these possible cuts.
The Sun reported that the USM will receive about $30 million in cuts, $10 million from the base operating budget and $20 million from the "cash-on-hand" fund balance. Community colleges are set to receive $16.3 million and independent colleges will receive a 25% cut of state funds of 8.4 million.
While it seems like the USM is taking a significant cut, we are fairing well in the broad picture of cuts. The USM encompasses 22% of "unrestricted funding" of the state budget, and will only take about 11% of total cuts.
Of course, the Governor may very well propose additional cuts beyond these estimates tomorrow in his final proposal, considering the recent decline in the economy. Also, revenue estimates may be down again later this year--we should embrace to consider further midyear budget cuts down the road.
On a related note, the Chronicle of Higher Education has written a story about the USM's unique strategy of cutting the fat in the budget and increasing efficiencies through the Effectiveness and Efficiency Initiative. Legislators have commented that this strategy has increased their trust and confidence in budget proposals from higher education.
Presidents of USM institutions will be faced with tough decisions after tomorrow when the first round of budget cuts are approved.
**Also note an article in the Diamondback highlighting a report from the Department of Legislative Services yesterday, which recommended that policymakers seriously reconsider another tuition freeze.
The Sun reported that the USM will receive about $30 million in cuts, $10 million from the base operating budget and $20 million from the "cash-on-hand" fund balance. Community colleges are set to receive $16.3 million and independent colleges will receive a 25% cut of state funds of 8.4 million.
While it seems like the USM is taking a significant cut, we are fairing well in the broad picture of cuts. The USM encompasses 22% of "unrestricted funding" of the state budget, and will only take about 11% of total cuts.
Of course, the Governor may very well propose additional cuts beyond these estimates tomorrow in his final proposal, considering the recent decline in the economy. Also, revenue estimates may be down again later this year--we should embrace to consider further midyear budget cuts down the road.
On a related note, the Chronicle of Higher Education has written a story about the USM's unique strategy of cutting the fat in the budget and increasing efficiencies through the Effectiveness and Efficiency Initiative. Legislators have commented that this strategy has increased their trust and confidence in budget proposals from higher education.
Presidents of USM institutions will be faced with tough decisions after tomorrow when the first round of budget cuts are approved.
**Also note an article in the Diamondback highlighting a report from the Department of Legislative Services yesterday, which recommended that policymakers seriously reconsider another tuition freeze.
Salisbury SGA Reaches out to Students
The Salisbury SGA has brought back "What do you want Wednesdays" in which members reach out to students across campus to hear about their concerns and thoughts (highlighted in a story in The Salisbury Flyer). The SGA carts around students to class while talking to them about their opinions. What other creative ways to your campuses reach out to students?
10.13.2008
USM Student Council Meeting 10/12 Meeting
The USM Student Council met Sunday 10/12. Council members considered a number of issues. Here is also my report, highlighting a number of pressing issues. Here is a highlight of the meeting:
Here is a brief excerpt from my report, highlighting the current fiscal position for higher education in Maryland:
- Election of Officers- David Walker (Bowie), Chair; Brady Walker (UB), Vice Chair; Scarlett Corso (UB) Secretary/Treasurer
- The Council discussed whether or not to take a position on the slots referendum, and ended up supporting the initiative 6-1-4. Leadership will draft a letter to the Chancellor to express the opinion of students.
- Brady Walker (UB) plans to develop a "platform" for the Council on various issues to enhance advocacy efforts.
- Michael Castello (UMBC) is working with Don Spicer and Andy Clark from the USM to proactively address issues on filesharing.
- The Council discussed issues of diversity and plans to research how campuses address diversity conflicts and what resources are available for students.
Here is a brief excerpt from my report, highlighting the current fiscal position for higher education in Maryland:
Please post any comments or questions and I will be sure that I find you the answer.The Governor will propose mid-year budgets cuts (FY09) to higher education to the Board of Public Works this coming Wednesday, October 15. The Sun reported that cuts might amount to $30 million, with $10 million from the operating budget and $20 million from the general fund balance. The Governor aims to cut $423 million from this year’s budget on Wednesday to make up for lower than expected tax revenues. This cut could expand before Wednesday, and we might very well see more mid-year budget cuts down the line in FY09. The decision on the slots referendum will likely impact the Governor’s cuts in coming months.
Planning for the FY10 operating budget has begun. The Department of Budget and Management has planned for a 6.4% increase in state fund support and a 4% increase in tuition. These numbers will undoubtedly change in coming months as policymakers get a better handle of projected tax revenues.
USM Student Council Endorses Slots Referendum
The USMSC voted yesterday to endorse the slots referendum by a vote of 6-1-4. Each institution has one vote, and all voting institutions were represented. Representatives discussed for a good while whether or not the Council should take a position on the referendum. A number of institutions, including UB, UMB, UMBC, and Towson, had spoken at length with institution-based student governments and expressed those viewpoints at the meeting. Other student representatives relied on informal conversations with students on campus.
The USMSC Leadership will communicate the opinion of the Council in a letter by next week.
The USMSC Leadership will communicate the opinion of the Council in a letter by next week.
10.09.2008
Towson SGA Endorses Slots
The Towson SGA endorsed the slots referendum Tuesday night. The Towson Towerlight covered the decision in an article today. The Towerlight also published an Op-Ed piece speaking out against the decision.
I had the opportunity to attend the SGA meeting and was impressed by the discourse of the SGA. The final vote was 17-8. The USM Student Council will consider a similar resolution this coming weekend.
I had the opportunity to attend the SGA meeting and was impressed by the discourse of the SGA. The final vote was 17-8. The USM Student Council will consider a similar resolution this coming weekend.
10.08.2008
Competitive Contracting for Food at Campus Events
It seems like a small issue, but many of our student fees go to purchase food for campus events. The UMBC SGA recently purchased ice cream for an event to watch the Vice Presidential debate. The UMBCUnderground blog picked up the story, examining the cost of the food provided, totaling $450. I inquired on the post to see if the SGA looked into other alternatives:
While I have raised the issue in this specific case at UMBC, the broader issue addresses whether student groups on campuses actually have the opportunity to pursue competitive alternatives for food contracting. UMBC's previous contract with Sodexho prohibited groups from serving food on campus from outside food providers. Bowie State students are currently participating in a review of their food contract and considering a provision allowing student groups to look outside their food provider for food at events.
What policy exists on your campus? Have you had any experience with ordering food from your on-campus food provider? Other thoughts?
Should we not question the actual expenditure by the SGA? Members of the food contract review committee worked hard during the selection process of Chartwells to ensure that student groups could go outside of the on-campus food provider for food at events. In other words, should we be upset with Chartwells because they have high prices, or be upset with the SGA for not looking outside Chartwells? Maybe the price for Chartwells will subside if student groups choose other providers…
While I have raised the issue in this specific case at UMBC, the broader issue addresses whether student groups on campuses actually have the opportunity to pursue competitive alternatives for food contracting. UMBC's previous contract with Sodexho prohibited groups from serving food on campus from outside food providers. Bowie State students are currently participating in a review of their food contract and considering a provision allowing student groups to look outside their food provider for food at events.
What policy exists on your campus? Have you had any experience with ordering food from your on-campus food provider? Other thoughts?
from the DBK...Clean Coal: A Down and Dirty Affair
Check out this article on Clean Coal written by Matt Dernoga, a sophomore at UMCP.
I was very disappointed with vice presidential candidates Sen. Joe Biden (D-Del.) and Gov. Sarah Palin (R-Alaska) when they were asked about "clean coal" in their debate last week. Both candidates voiced their support for clean coal, and Biden even denied he had ever stated there was no such thing as "clean coal." Neither of these responses startled me. Both presidential candidates Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.) and Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) have repeatedly talked about "clean coal" at their rallies as part of their energy plans...
10.07.2008
UMBC SGA Endorses Slots Referendum
Last night, the UMBC Student Government Association voted to endorse referendum question 2 for the upcoming election, supporting the restricted use of slots in Maryland. The legislation outlines that funds from slots will be used to fund education in Maryland, including up to $150 million in higher education construction dollars each year. Also, the Higher Education Investment Fund funded through the Corporate Income Tax, bringing in about $55 million to higher education each year, will only be retained if slots pass. If the referendum fails, those dollars will be dumped into the general fund. Six of the nine Senators voted for the resolution, none opposed, and three abstained from the vote.
The resolution preludes an expected vote by the USM Student Council at its upcoming meeting on October 12. On a related note, the Towson student government association will consider a similar resolution this evening at their 5pm meeting.
The resolution preludes an expected vote by the USM Student Council at its upcoming meeting on October 12. On a related note, the Towson student government association will consider a similar resolution this evening at their 5pm meeting.
10.03.2008
Becoming a Teacher in USM Schools
Yesterday, the Board of Regents Education Policy Committee reviewed and endorsed the Teacher Shortage Task Force Report 2008. Regent Florestano co-chaired the task force. Issues addressed in this report are close to home for me because I am enrolled in a teacher certification program at UMBC, but the issues addressed have broad effects on each of us and our future.
While some of us may not attribute or success to our K-12 teachers, most would agree that we would not be in college had we not recieved a quality education in elementary, middle, and high school. Our families rely on good schools, and our State relies on a constant pipeline of well-educated children. So what's the current problem?
- in 2005, Maryland colleges trained only 33% of newly hired teachers in Maryland
- 50% of teachers leave after five years in the profession
- recruitment of a new teacher costs public schools on average $78,750
- 50% of students who graduate from teacher education programs never teach
The USM controls much of the pipeline of teachers. And while much support is needed from the State, our institutions control the capacity and direct incentives for students enrolling in teacher education programs.
Here are some notes that I took when reading the report:
Where do we go from here? How do we recruit more teachers? What would convince you to enter a teacher education program and then become a teacher?
While some of us may not attribute or success to our K-12 teachers, most would agree that we would not be in college had we not recieved a quality education in elementary, middle, and high school. Our families rely on good schools, and our State relies on a constant pipeline of well-educated children. So what's the current problem?
- in 2005, Maryland colleges trained only 33% of newly hired teachers in Maryland
- 50% of teachers leave after five years in the profession
- recruitment of a new teacher costs public schools on average $78,750
- 50% of students who graduate from teacher education programs never teach
The USM controls much of the pipeline of teachers. And while much support is needed from the State, our institutions control the capacity and direct incentives for students enrolling in teacher education programs.
Here are some notes that I took when reading the report:
Other questions:
- What are target goals for teacher production and retention? Who makes these targets if we do end up making them?
- What are the qualifying scores of nearby states for Praxis I & II? What is the data that is driving recommendation number two? Are students not passing tests coming from our programs? It seems like we can maintain high standards if we simply train and support more of our teachers.
- What are funds used for in PDS partnerships?
- What “career-advancement” steps exist for teachers who chose to stay in the classroom? Are these adequate?
- Are any programs providing training for urban classrooms as to better prepare teachers for the unique challenges specifically in many schools in Baltimore City, Baltimore County, and Prince George’s County?
Incentives: The report seemed light on recommendations for specific salary-based incentives. I am wondering how much consideration should be given to incentives for teachers who teach at Title I schools and teachers who teach in high-needs subject areas.
Data: I am so glad that this was brought up. A major problem beyond the data we do not have is who reviews the data that we do have? And what actions are made upon these. For instance, who tracks the number of graduates that are produced from each school? How are these incentivized?
Teacher Education Programs: Being in a teacher preparation program, I have seen so many individuals drop out of the program. While I am mostly versed in education at UMBC, I have some concerns about policies and procedures that seem to be broad-based:
- Site-based learning has become a critical part to earlier parts of education coursework, but transportation and time has become an issue for students; students do not have the time built into their schedules to perform these service hours and also sometimes do not have transportation.
- Students are very frustrated when they pay full tuition during their Phase II internship and are working full-time. Further, many faculty encourage students not to work outside of teaching and explain that they should “save up.” At the very least, universities should explore tuition remission during the Phase II semester.
- Schools should review when students are recruited to begin teacher education courses. At some schools, students are “discouraged” from taking education courses until, at the earliest, their sophomore year. Teacher education must get on the “map” for students in planning, and their must be opportunities for students to jump on the teacher bandwagon early.
- Because teacher education plans are so rigid, review of the schedule of courses should be had at each institution to ensure that students can take courses in both the spring and fall semesters. Additionally, it should be considered whether Phase I can be moved to the spring and Phase II to the following fall.
Where do we go from here? How do we recruit more teachers? What would convince you to enter a teacher education program and then become a teacher?
10.01.2008
Congress Kind of Saves Internet Radio
I don't know how many people use Pandora, but I find it to be an excellent music streaming service. It's an outgrowth of the Music Genome Project, an undertaking to figure out what properties link different kinds of music together to better understand both music and our genre tastes. The idea is pretty simple - put in an artist you like, and Pandora creates a radio station based around that and similar artists. If you like a song, they provide links to online stores like iTunes and Amazon so you can buy it. Seems like a pretty decent idea - allowing people to listen only to music they like while exposing them to new artists they might not otherwise have discovered. I know I've discovered a number of excellent artists this way.
Not content with the free promotion, the music industry has been trying to get Pandora to pay exorbitant royalty fees each time a song is played. Of course, with the number of songs a service like Pandora is playing at any given time, the costs quickly go through the roof. This demand from the music industry has threatened to kill Pandora and other similar music streaming services.
In an effort to save themselves, Pandora has been in negotiations with the music industry to pay not per-song royalties, but a percentage of their overall profits. It seems like a lousy deal, but it might just be enough to save the service. Unfortunately, the deadline to "pay up" was approaching faster than the talks, a plight that was recently delayed by an act of Congress. Far from settling anything, the Webcaster Settlement Act of 2008 gives them more time to reach a decision. Let's hope the music industry can stop shooting itself in the foot long enough to reach a deal with these valuable 21st century services. In the meantime, enjoy Pandora.
Not content with the free promotion, the music industry has been trying to get Pandora to pay exorbitant royalty fees each time a song is played. Of course, with the number of songs a service like Pandora is playing at any given time, the costs quickly go through the roof. This demand from the music industry has threatened to kill Pandora and other similar music streaming services.
In an effort to save themselves, Pandora has been in negotiations with the music industry to pay not per-song royalties, but a percentage of their overall profits. It seems like a lousy deal, but it might just be enough to save the service. Unfortunately, the deadline to "pay up" was approaching faster than the talks, a plight that was recently delayed by an act of Congress. Far from settling anything, the Webcaster Settlement Act of 2008 gives them more time to reach a decision. Let's hope the music industry can stop shooting itself in the foot long enough to reach a deal with these valuable 21st century services. In the meantime, enjoy Pandora.
9.30.2008
The Credit Crisis and Higher Education
The US economy is struggling amidst a mortgage and credit crisis. Banks and lenders are failing left and right. And Congress has been contemplating a bailout package of $700 billion. To say the least, times are uncertain and and the economy is on the rocks.
But what does this mean for college students and our way of life? I am no finance expert, but my understanding of the issue is that we must act to save our banks. Our way of life relies upon credit for funding mortgages, small businesses, cars, and education. So, if the economy falters and credit is limited, our way of life could significantly change.
Of course, state support for our institutions will inevitably be at risk with advances in the credit crisis. Many of our buildings are funded through bonds which rely on credit. And, our state support for tuition and operating budget relies on tax receipts, which could be significantly affected with a failed economy.
I have provided a few resources for you to review the current proposal:
- Congress set to revise proposal
- C-Span with Coverage of Fiscal News
- Contact your legislator to let them know your thoughts
What are your thoughts on the credit crisis? How has it affected you? What are your thoughts on the $700 billion bailout?
But what does this mean for college students and our way of life? I am no finance expert, but my understanding of the issue is that we must act to save our banks. Our way of life relies upon credit for funding mortgages, small businesses, cars, and education. So, if the economy falters and credit is limited, our way of life could significantly change.
Of course, state support for our institutions will inevitably be at risk with advances in the credit crisis. Many of our buildings are funded through bonds which rely on credit. And, our state support for tuition and operating budget relies on tax receipts, which could be significantly affected with a failed economy.
I have provided a few resources for you to review the current proposal:
- Congress set to revise proposal
- C-Span with Coverage of Fiscal News
- Contact your legislator to let them know your thoughts
What are your thoughts on the credit crisis? How has it affected you? What are your thoughts on the $700 billion bailout?
9.25.2008
Morgan State President Announces Retirement
After days of anticipation and speculation, President of Morgan State University, Earl Richardson, announced his retirement. See the Sun Article to learn more.
Dr. Richardson has served at the helm of Morgan for 24 years and will officially step down December 31, 2009. His tenure has been marked by strong growth for the university. It has also been marked by some controversy with surrounding schools, such as Towson and UMBC, as it fought the "unnecessary duplication" of programs as outlined in US v. Fordice. Dr. Richardson has argued for and successfully pursued increased and appropriate funding for the historically black institution.
Undoubtedly, his successor will have big shoes to fill in coming years.
Dr. Richardson has served at the helm of Morgan for 24 years and will officially step down December 31, 2009. His tenure has been marked by strong growth for the university. It has also been marked by some controversy with surrounding schools, such as Towson and UMBC, as it fought the "unnecessary duplication" of programs as outlined in US v. Fordice. Dr. Richardson has argued for and successfully pursued increased and appropriate funding for the historically black institution.
Undoubtedly, his successor will have big shoes to fill in coming years.
9.24.2008
Univ. Senate to debate Good Samaritan policy this year - News
Univ. Senate to debate Good Samaritan policy this year - News
This past Spring, students at University of Maryland, College Park voted with 94% support in favor of a "Good Samaritan Law" where students would be afforded amnesty if calling emergency services to get friends and peers necessary help who appear to be dangerously intoxicated.
What do you think? Should the University Senate at UMCP endorse this? Is this a policy that other system schools should consider?
This past Spring, students at University of Maryland, College Park voted with 94% support in favor of a "Good Samaritan Law" where students would be afforded amnesty if calling emergency services to get friends and peers necessary help who appear to be dangerously intoxicated.
What do you think? Should the University Senate at UMCP endorse this? Is this a policy that other system schools should consider?
The College Sustainability Report Card
A new tool has been created to report on steps made by universities to become environmentally sustainable. Check out the webiste.
9.23.2008
Maryland Colleges and Univeristies Recognized for Green Efforts!
Hey All!
If you didn't catch The Baltimore Sun's "b" free daily... (think The Washington Post's Express) take a look! It outlines a lot of work done around MD schools with sustainability efforts.
The feature also talks about work done specifically with Towson Energy Activists, Maryland Student Climate Coalition and the Powervote campaign.
Big MD climate buzz is spreading and schools are looking to the USM for example! Let's continue leading the east coast in sustainability initiatives!
If you didn't catch The Baltimore Sun's "b" free daily... (think The Washington Post's Express) take a look! It outlines a lot of work done around MD schools with sustainability efforts.
The feature also talks about work done specifically with Towson Energy Activists, Maryland Student Climate Coalition and the Powervote campaign.
Big MD climate buzz is spreading and schools are looking to the USM for example! Let's continue leading the east coast in sustainability initiatives!
9.22.2008
Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement
"I've been following the developments of the ultra-secret Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement since this document leaked several months ago. This treaty represents an assemblage of the world's wealthiest countries getting together to fight a rampant problem - not public health, not rogue states, not even terrorism, but copyright infringement.
It has become clear that the term counterfeiting will not be restricted to physical goods, where cheap, inferior reproductions could cause harm to the unwitting end user, but instead expanded to target "internet distribution." To quote Canadian Internet Policy and Public Interest Clinic (CIPPIC) counsel David Fewer,
This agreement is slated to be fast-tracked with a goal of having it signed by the end of this year. Unfortunately, the entire process has remained shrouded in mystery with little public input on an issue that will assuredly affect them. It's time to end these kinds of one-sided debates.
The Electronic Frontier Foundation has a very informative page on the treaty as well as a means of contacting your senator - urge them to demand that this treaty be brought into the light so we can judge its contents."
[via Zwybak!]
It has become clear that the term counterfeiting will not be restricted to physical goods, where cheap, inferior reproductions could cause harm to the unwitting end user, but instead expanded to target "internet distribution." To quote Canadian Internet Policy and Public Interest Clinic (CIPPIC) counsel David Fewer,
“If Hollywood could order intellectual property laws for Christmas, what would they look like? This is pretty close.”
This agreement is slated to be fast-tracked with a goal of having it signed by the end of this year. Unfortunately, the entire process has remained shrouded in mystery with little public input on an issue that will assuredly affect them. It's time to end these kinds of one-sided debates.
The Electronic Frontier Foundation has a very informative page on the treaty as well as a means of contacting your senator - urge them to demand that this treaty be brought into the light so we can judge its contents."
[via Zwybak!]
Looking Forward in higher education...budget cuts
I spent two days last week participating in a retreat of the Board of Regents. We reviewed strategic objectives for each campus and heard from Presidents on how they would handle budget cuts in Fiscal Year 09 (this current year) and FY10. We asked Presidents to prepare statements on a 2% FY09 base cute and a 3% FY10 cut. The most popular cuts that we heard were:
- maintaining the hiring freeze
- further backlogging deferred maintenance
- financial aid for students.
We asked the Presidents to prepare these numbers in expectation of budget cuts in the current year because of the mid-year estimated budget shortfalls (see previous entry). It is estimated that the Governor will cut just over $220 million this year, and because higher education is such a large share of the discretionary budget, we expected to see cuts.
Since the retreat, we have heard from the Governor's office that we should expect to see a base budget cut of $10 million and a cut from our fund balance reserve of $20 million. While we will see a total of $30 million in cuts this year, the lasting effect on the budget will only be a cut of $10 million from each year out.
Of course, this budget situation is a tale of two cities. The Governor has worked very hard to support higher education, and planned to fund a tuition freeze for undergraduate in-state students at the cost of $16 million and fully funded the rest of the operating budget and capital projects. On the other hand, the system did not raise tuition because the Governor planned to fund the difference; but now with budget cuts, those dollars will now not come to our institutions.
Of course, things will be difficult over the coming months and couple years. A partnership with the Governor's Office is critical to maintaining as much funding as possible for education. Governor O'Malley been very supportive in the past and I do not doubt that he will be in the future.
- maintaining the hiring freeze
- further backlogging deferred maintenance
- financial aid for students.
We asked the Presidents to prepare these numbers in expectation of budget cuts in the current year because of the mid-year estimated budget shortfalls (see previous entry). It is estimated that the Governor will cut just over $220 million this year, and because higher education is such a large share of the discretionary budget, we expected to see cuts.
Since the retreat, we have heard from the Governor's office that we should expect to see a base budget cut of $10 million and a cut from our fund balance reserve of $20 million. While we will see a total of $30 million in cuts this year, the lasting effect on the budget will only be a cut of $10 million from each year out.
Of course, this budget situation is a tale of two cities. The Governor has worked very hard to support higher education, and planned to fund a tuition freeze for undergraduate in-state students at the cost of $16 million and fully funded the rest of the operating budget and capital projects. On the other hand, the system did not raise tuition because the Governor planned to fund the difference; but now with budget cuts, those dollars will now not come to our institutions.
Of course, things will be difficult over the coming months and couple years. A partnership with the Governor's Office is critical to maintaining as much funding as possible for education. Governor O'Malley been very supportive in the past and I do not doubt that he will be in the future.
9.19.2008
Breaking Ground at UMB Pharmacy
I had a great time this morning attending the "groundbreaking" ceremony for the UMB Pharmacy Addition. Governor O'Malley, President Ramsay, Speaker Pro Tem Jones, Pharmacy SGA President Yara Haddad, and others participated in the event celebrating a long-awaited project. My understanding is that this project has been in queue for nearly two decades, and finally has been pushed through planning and now to the construction phase. While the building has seemed a bit auxiliary in previous years, leaders in Annapolis have recognized the great need to support the Pharmacy program becuase of the great demand for pharmacists in the region.
This case raises a question that I had for a long time, which was how are buildings actually built? And related, why does it take so long? And who pays for the buildings?
Generally, funding comes from four areas for buildings in universities:
1) state budget
2) university budget general fund balance, whether from leftover student fees or unrestricted state, federal, or grant funds
3) private partner dollars
4) bonds (loans), whether applied on the balance of the university or private partner
The USM has provided an overview of the capital budget process for the public. More information can be found at the Capital Planning page the USM website.
Universities by far prefer to recieve funding from the State for capital projects. The availability of these funds is often limited, particularly during tough fiscal times. Additionally, in higher education, buildings that are funded both through public dollars and private dollars/bonds are often easier to push through the budget process becuase of the private buy-in and initiative ( a nickel, get a dime).
State funds, though, can only be used for "core mission" facilities. Core mission facilities are those which relate directly to the academic mission of the university, such as lecture halls, academic offices, administrative offices, athletic facilities used for academic gym classes. What is not included is residential facilities, dining halls, and student unions. I talk more about this budget process in a previous post. The other three categories can be used to fund these projects.
From my view, one problem with the reliance on the state capital budget process is that universities struggle to respond quickly to the needs of the students and the State in higher education. Additionally, false hope can develop if capital porjects are delayed year-after-year in the capital budget queue. The UMB Pharmacy building serves as an example of this. Nevertheless, the State provides a great resource and investment for our universities through capital projects. And as UMBC graduate Speaker Pro Tem says at groundbreaking ceremonies, "May it be on-time and underbudget!"
This case raises a question that I had for a long time, which was how are buildings actually built? And related, why does it take so long? And who pays for the buildings?
Generally, funding comes from four areas for buildings in universities:
1) state budget
2) university budget general fund balance, whether from leftover student fees or unrestricted state, federal, or grant funds
3) private partner dollars
4) bonds (loans), whether applied on the balance of the university or private partner
The USM has provided an overview of the capital budget process for the public. More information can be found at the Capital Planning page the USM website.
Universities by far prefer to recieve funding from the State for capital projects. The availability of these funds is often limited, particularly during tough fiscal times. Additionally, in higher education, buildings that are funded both through public dollars and private dollars/bonds are often easier to push through the budget process becuase of the private buy-in and initiative ( a nickel, get a dime).
State funds, though, can only be used for "core mission" facilities. Core mission facilities are those which relate directly to the academic mission of the university, such as lecture halls, academic offices, administrative offices, athletic facilities used for academic gym classes. What is not included is residential facilities, dining halls, and student unions. I talk more about this budget process in a previous post. The other three categories can be used to fund these projects.
From my view, one problem with the reliance on the state capital budget process is that universities struggle to respond quickly to the needs of the students and the State in higher education. Additionally, false hope can develop if capital porjects are delayed year-after-year in the capital budget queue. The UMB Pharmacy building serves as an example of this. Nevertheless, the State provides a great resource and investment for our universities through capital projects. And as UMBC graduate Speaker Pro Tem says at groundbreaking ceremonies, "May it be on-time and underbudget!"
Student Voting
Hello All -
For those of you who do not know me, my name is Devin and I am a former graduate student at UMCP and former Chair of the University System Student Council. I wanted to post in response to the questions from Towson since I am currently working at my alma mater as the Coordinator for TerpsVote - the campus wide initiative to register, inform and support student voters.
We have a number of great things going on and I encourage you to check out our website at www.terpsvote.umd.edu to learn more about what we are doing, read our FAQs about student voting and get ideas for things you can do on your campus. Also, please feel free to email me at ellisd@umd.edu if you have other questions or want more information.
Devin
For those of you who do not know me, my name is Devin and I am a former graduate student at UMCP and former Chair of the University System Student Council. I wanted to post in response to the questions from Towson since I am currently working at my alma mater as the Coordinator for TerpsVote - the campus wide initiative to register, inform and support student voters.
We have a number of great things going on and I encourage you to check out our website at www.terpsvote.umd.edu to learn more about what we are doing, read our FAQs about student voting and get ideas for things you can do on your campus. Also, please feel free to email me at ellisd@umd.edu if you have other questions or want more information.
Devin
9.16.2008
Student Voting Rights - Looking for Feedback/Input
As a part of Towson's 2009 Legislative Agenda I've been charged with researching voting rights issues as they pertain to students both across the country and for Maryland institutions specifically.
The main points I'm looking into are (1) what policies do different schools have concerning student voting, (2) are there polling places actually on campus or is there some form of transportation provided to sites for students registered using their on-campus addresses, (3) is there any policy that excuses students from class for voting or makes it clear that there it isn't an excused absence, and in general any other information concerning students attending Maryland schools.
I've tried combing through many USM schools' websites and haven't found much. If everyone could make an inquiry at their schools concerning these issues for me, it would be greatly appreciated.
The main points I'm looking into are (1) what policies do different schools have concerning student voting, (2) are there polling places actually on campus or is there some form of transportation provided to sites for students registered using their on-campus addresses, (3) is there any policy that excuses students from class for voting or makes it clear that there it isn't an excused absence, and in general any other information concerning students attending Maryland schools.
I've tried combing through many USM schools' websites and haven't found much. If everyone could make an inquiry at their schools concerning these issues for me, it would be greatly appreciated.
USM Imposes Hiring Freezes
In response the the impending budget cuts, the USM has imposed a hiring freeze across all USM institutions as per a memo sent to all state institutions Thursday afternoon.
How are these measures to combat the declining USM budget going to affect designated growth institutions like Towson University who plans to increase the next few years of freshman classes by 700 students. Can schools that are on track with a growth plan, increasing the student body an building new facilities survive these freezes if we cannot hire staff and faculty to teach more classes?
Read Article Here
How are these measures to combat the declining USM budget going to affect designated growth institutions like Towson University who plans to increase the next few years of freshman classes by 700 students. Can schools that are on track with a growth plan, increasing the student body an building new facilities survive these freezes if we cannot hire staff and faculty to teach more classes?
Read Article Here
9.15.2008
Way2GoMD
This past Saturday morning, I had the opportunity to attend the launching of the "Way2Go Maryland" Campaign designed to increase outreach to middle school students about college. As some may know, i am particularly passionate about this program because of my future plans to teach middle school in Baltimore City.
The launch of the campaign was held at the Maryland Science Center. After the initial ceremony, lunch and a college fair was held for the families and students in attendance from all over Baltimore City. I had the opportunity to speak with a number of students and families and was inspired by their persistence and dedication to pursue higher education. I know that I often take for granted the opportunities that I was presented with.
In coming months, the program will reach out to middle school students and their families both about the opportunities for college and the steps that need to be taken starting in middle school to help prepare students for higher education. The system will be working with its co-sponsor, ATK, and community groups to connect.
In coming weeks, I will be sure to share with you upcoming opportunities to participate in this project. I am inspired to share the opportunity that I have been afforded and I hope you share the same sentiment.
The launch of the campaign was held at the Maryland Science Center. After the initial ceremony, lunch and a college fair was held for the families and students in attendance from all over Baltimore City. I had the opportunity to speak with a number of students and families and was inspired by their persistence and dedication to pursue higher education. I know that I often take for granted the opportunities that I was presented with.
In coming months, the program will reach out to middle school students and their families both about the opportunities for college and the steps that need to be taken starting in middle school to help prepare students for higher education. The system will be working with its co-sponsor, ATK, and community groups to connect.
In coming weeks, I will be sure to share with you upcoming opportunities to participate in this project. I am inspired to share the opportunity that I have been afforded and I hope you share the same sentiment.
9.12.2008
The "College Experience" for Nontraditonal Students
After a group planning session last night for one of my classes, I got into talking with one of my peers about his college experience. My friend works at UMB in the evenings, has a wife and daughter, and is attending UMBC on the side. Later that night, my thoughts were brought back again to my friend and his experience at UMBC and how we serve nontraditional students.
As we examine growth in higher education in coming years, there seem to be two major areas of expansion; expansion of non-traditional students and also an increase of minority and low-income students. Both areas of growth are a response to increased accessibility to higher education and increased demand for skilled workers.
But what does this all really mean? It means that our colleges do not simply serve 18-22 year-old's who live on or near campus with friends, like me. More critically, our campuses have to both meet the needs and work for our peers who are working part- and full-time jobs, have families or parents to take care of, and/or travel some distance to attend school. Every time I register for classes, I think to myself whether I could make it at UMBC reasonably by taking classes that would not disrupt with a workday. While possible under ideal circumstances, its quite difficult. I also think about campus resources, and realize they are mostly only open during the day.
Many colleges are readily exploring e-learning and distance to allow students to learn away from the college. While I understand the reasons for these changes, I might challenge this notion and suggest that we mold our current campuses and services to serve nontraditional students on campus. Most professors are available for advising during the day. Food options often close at night. Offices for business and academic services often close at night. Few classes are ever held on weekends. Majors have limited course selections early in the morning or late at night. Athletic facilities may not be open at ideal hours for students. I suggest we challenge or notions of how campuses operate as we consider the experience of nontraditional students.
How does your university serve, cater, and support nontraditional students? What are some things I should raise at the Board of Regents when it comes to the experience of nontraditional students?
As we examine growth in higher education in coming years, there seem to be two major areas of expansion; expansion of non-traditional students and also an increase of minority and low-income students. Both areas of growth are a response to increased accessibility to higher education and increased demand for skilled workers.
But what does this all really mean? It means that our colleges do not simply serve 18-22 year-old's who live on or near campus with friends, like me. More critically, our campuses have to both meet the needs and work for our peers who are working part- and full-time jobs, have families or parents to take care of, and/or travel some distance to attend school. Every time I register for classes, I think to myself whether I could make it at UMBC reasonably by taking classes that would not disrupt with a workday. While possible under ideal circumstances, its quite difficult. I also think about campus resources, and realize they are mostly only open during the day.
Many colleges are readily exploring e-learning and distance to allow students to learn away from the college. While I understand the reasons for these changes, I might challenge this notion and suggest that we mold our current campuses and services to serve nontraditional students on campus. Most professors are available for advising during the day. Food options often close at night. Offices for business and academic services often close at night. Few classes are ever held on weekends. Majors have limited course selections early in the morning or late at night. Athletic facilities may not be open at ideal hours for students. I suggest we challenge or notions of how campuses operate as we consider the experience of nontraditional students.
How does your university serve, cater, and support nontraditional students? What are some things I should raise at the Board of Regents when it comes to the experience of nontraditional students?
9.10.2008
Thinking Like a Researcher (Or: Darn it, Jim, I'm a Doctoral Student, not a real live human being!)
I will say this right at the outset: Once you enroll in a doctoral program, and start doing very issue-specific, in-depth research, you forget how to think like a normal human being. But that's OK, because then you can do cool things like this:
In the post from yesterday, Josh reported that the USM Board of Regents unanimously endorsed the upcoming ballot referendum to install up to 15,000 slot machines across 5 locations in Maryland. This would (according to state estimates) bring in between $600 and $700 million in net revenue.
There are great arguments on both sides, political and moral. But as a grad student, and a researcher, that's not what interests me. I can't take a political side. I have no moral opinion one way or the other (I'm not a theology student). What I can do is worry about how to make good estimates.
The big issue with slots, if you're me, is that big revenue number: $600 to $700 million. Where does it come from? More importantly, what does it account for, or not account for? (For instance, competition with current entertainment industries? Competition against the 4 other states within an easy day's drive that already have established slot industries? A guaranteed decline in lottery revenues? So far, I haven't seen this anywhere in state estimates, and this is not chump-change.)
I can't post up all the questions now (I'm working on a full and well-cited report at work, and I don't want to spoil that project), but I merely post this to suggest that once you become a research specialist, the world doesn't look the same to you anymore. (See the excellent book Freakonomics, for more examples).
In the future, I may post other examples of how specialization warps your thinking; I invite other researchers, especially grad students, to email me with their own stories.
In the post from yesterday, Josh reported that the USM Board of Regents unanimously endorsed the upcoming ballot referendum to install up to 15,000 slot machines across 5 locations in Maryland. This would (according to state estimates) bring in between $600 and $700 million in net revenue.
There are great arguments on both sides, political and moral. But as a grad student, and a researcher, that's not what interests me. I can't take a political side. I have no moral opinion one way or the other (I'm not a theology student). What I can do is worry about how to make good estimates.
The big issue with slots, if you're me, is that big revenue number: $600 to $700 million. Where does it come from? More importantly, what does it account for, or not account for? (For instance, competition with current entertainment industries? Competition against the 4 other states within an easy day's drive that already have established slot industries? A guaranteed decline in lottery revenues? So far, I haven't seen this anywhere in state estimates, and this is not chump-change.)
I can't post up all the questions now (I'm working on a full and well-cited report at work, and I don't want to spoil that project), but I merely post this to suggest that once you become a research specialist, the world doesn't look the same to you anymore. (See the excellent book Freakonomics, for more examples).
In the future, I may post other examples of how specialization warps your thinking; I invite other researchers, especially grad students, to email me with their own stories.
9.09.2008
Rainy Days: Budget Shortfalls for Maryland
The state estimates today released that revenues will fall $432 million short this year (Letter from Board of Estimates), and could expand to $950 million next year (Baltimore Sun Article). The Board of Public Works plans to immediately put the breaks on a number of capital projects, many of which could affect you. In this fiscal year (2009 Capital Budget Draft), the University System of Maryland is slated to receive the second greatest amount of capital dollars, right behind public school construction, with a nearly $144 million allocation. The Governor has provided a response.
Also, check out the statement by Comptroller Peter Franchot.
Implications could be rough for higher education. First, capital projects could get hit, and later, we could suffer in the operating budget.
Also, check out the statement by Comptroller Peter Franchot.
Implications could be rough for higher education. First, capital projects could get hit, and later, we could suffer in the operating budget.
USMSC - First Impressions
Like Brian, Sunday was my first experience attending a USMSC meeting. I'd had the opportunity to hear a lot of the news from my fellow UMBC students who were involved in the council last year, so it was exciting to be a part of it myself. It's refreshing to be a part of a group of students from across the state who care about continuing to improve our higher education system.
There are a number of important issues that we are going to be making decisions about in the next few months. Most of the technical details have already been posted here by Josh, so I'd like to talk a bit about the directions I think the council should go.
The issue of slot machines in Maryland has been controversial for years. This November, we'll be voting on a constitutional amendment to allow their placement in several specific locations across the state. Some of the money earned from the slots will be diverted to support higher education. While passing this agenda item via constitutional amendment seems a little extreme, I am in favor of the idea. Currently Maryland residents who wish to gamble this way are forced to travel to other nearby states to do so, bringing their dollars with them. I'd like to see that money be kept in-state, especially when we can use the income to support things like higher education. We might even be able to attract residents from other states to spend their money here, especially at races like Preakness. The bottom line for me is that if people want to gamble, they will - if not here, then with our neighbor states. Instead of funneling that money to them, let's keep it here and use it for worthy causes.
The issue of lowering the drinking age has gotten a bit misinterpreted. What Brit Kirwan and others are supporting is honest, scientific discussion on drinking age limitations and their effectiveness at preventing alcohol-related problems in young adults. We all have our personal opinions on which way the law should go, but the truth is that the only way to settle the discussion is with research. Let's bring some science to this argument in the hope of moving forward in a knowledgeable manner.
It's going to be an exciting year - I'm looking forward to it!
There are a number of important issues that we are going to be making decisions about in the next few months. Most of the technical details have already been posted here by Josh, so I'd like to talk a bit about the directions I think the council should go.
The issue of slot machines in Maryland has been controversial for years. This November, we'll be voting on a constitutional amendment to allow their placement in several specific locations across the state. Some of the money earned from the slots will be diverted to support higher education. While passing this agenda item via constitutional amendment seems a little extreme, I am in favor of the idea. Currently Maryland residents who wish to gamble this way are forced to travel to other nearby states to do so, bringing their dollars with them. I'd like to see that money be kept in-state, especially when we can use the income to support things like higher education. We might even be able to attract residents from other states to spend their money here, especially at races like Preakness. The bottom line for me is that if people want to gamble, they will - if not here, then with our neighbor states. Instead of funneling that money to them, let's keep it here and use it for worthy causes.
The issue of lowering the drinking age has gotten a bit misinterpreted. What Brit Kirwan and others are supporting is honest, scientific discussion on drinking age limitations and their effectiveness at preventing alcohol-related problems in young adults. We all have our personal opinions on which way the law should go, but the truth is that the only way to settle the discussion is with research. Let's bring some science to this argument in the hope of moving forward in a knowledgeable manner.
It's going to be an exciting year - I'm looking forward to it!
9.08.2008
Board of Regents endorses Slots
This past friday at the first full meeting Board of Regents for this academic year, other Regents and I voted to endorse the slots referendum to appear on the ballot in November. The USM Student Council also discussed the issue at length at its meeting yesterday. I voted to endorse the plan becuase I believe that potential societal costs are outweighed by the benefit for higher education. The revenues from slots, which I presume will amount to about $400 million a year, will be dedicated to a fund for education. Up to $150 million of this fund can be dedicated to higher education capital projects each year.
In light of these developments, I have pulled together some resources for you that will be useful in considering the issue:
Non-Technical Bill Summary
Copy of Legislation passed by Maryland General Assembly (description of locations included)
Ballot Language
Marylanders United to Stop Slots
For Maryland- Pro Slots Advocacy Group
Sun Article on BOR Endorsement of Slots
What are you thoughts on slots in Maryland? Do you think the benefits for higher education make the proposal worthwhile?
In light of these developments, I have pulled together some resources for you that will be useful in considering the issue:
Non-Technical Bill Summary
Copy of Legislation passed by Maryland General Assembly (description of locations included)
Ballot Language
(Chapter 5, Acts of 2007 Special Session)
Authorizing Video Lottery Terminals (Slot Machines) to Fund Education
Authorizes the State to issue up to five video lottery licenses for the purpose of raising revenue for education of children in public schools, prekindergarten through grade 12, public school construction and improvements, and construction of capital projects at community colleges and higher education institutions. No more than a total number of 15,000 video lottery terminals may be authorized in the State, and only one license may be issued for each specified location in Anne Arundel, Cecil, Worcester, and Allegany Counties, and Baltimore City. Any additional forms or expansion of commercial gaming in Maryland is prohibited, unless approved by a voter referendum.
(Enacts new Article XIX of the Maryland Constitution)
- For the Constitutional Amendment
- Against the Constitutional Amendment
Marylanders United to Stop Slots
For Maryland- Pro Slots Advocacy Group
Sun Article on BOR Endorsement of Slots
What are you thoughts on slots in Maryland? Do you think the benefits for higher education make the proposal worthwhile?
9.07.2008
First USMSC Meeting/Transcript Fees
Hello Everyone,
My name is Brian Frazee and I am a sophomore at UMBC. Today, I attended my first USMSC meeting as a shadow representative and wanted to write a bit about what I learned. I was very impressed with the USM Student Council. I knew that the USMSC had a very important role, but I didn't realize until today how dedicated and conscientious all of the representatives are.
It was very refreshing as a USM student to see that representatives from all of our institutions cared so much about the system as a whole, as well as their own respective institutions. We debated real issues and were able to listen to numerous different perspectives on pertinent topics such as lowering the drinking age, tuition policy, environmental sustainability, and the slots referendum. Having guest speakers to help us facilitate these discussions helped us even more because we were able to obtain expert knowledge, research, and facts that helped us determine how to render the students' perspective to the system leadership, including the Board of Regents and Chancellor Kirwan.
All in all, I am very impressed and very excited to begin working as a UMBC representative to the USMSC. I am very inspired by all of the other representatives that were present today and I thank all of you for such a productive, efficient meeting.
I did want to bring up an issue that is currently facing UMBC students. Up until July 1 of this year, transcripts were free for students to obtain. Now, we have to pay $8 for each transcript, which concerns many students because of the typical amount of transcripts we need over the course of our lifetime (grad school, careers, etc.) Today at the USMSC meeting, I brought up the point and I found out that some institutions in the system charge approximately $5 per transcript after 3 free transcripts (in any given transaction), while others charge per transcript or not at all. Can each school contact me or comment on this post and tell me how their school deals with transcripts? Do you all have to pay? This information will be helpful for me because UMBC student leaders are initiating efforts to either reduce or eliminate this $8 fee. Thanks!
My name is Brian Frazee and I am a sophomore at UMBC. Today, I attended my first USMSC meeting as a shadow representative and wanted to write a bit about what I learned. I was very impressed with the USM Student Council. I knew that the USMSC had a very important role, but I didn't realize until today how dedicated and conscientious all of the representatives are.
It was very refreshing as a USM student to see that representatives from all of our institutions cared so much about the system as a whole, as well as their own respective institutions. We debated real issues and were able to listen to numerous different perspectives on pertinent topics such as lowering the drinking age, tuition policy, environmental sustainability, and the slots referendum. Having guest speakers to help us facilitate these discussions helped us even more because we were able to obtain expert knowledge, research, and facts that helped us determine how to render the students' perspective to the system leadership, including the Board of Regents and Chancellor Kirwan.
All in all, I am very impressed and very excited to begin working as a UMBC representative to the USMSC. I am very inspired by all of the other representatives that were present today and I thank all of you for such a productive, efficient meeting.
I did want to bring up an issue that is currently facing UMBC students. Up until July 1 of this year, transcripts were free for students to obtain. Now, we have to pay $8 for each transcript, which concerns many students because of the typical amount of transcripts we need over the course of our lifetime (grad school, careers, etc.) Today at the USMSC meeting, I brought up the point and I found out that some institutions in the system charge approximately $5 per transcript after 3 free transcripts (in any given transaction), while others charge per transcript or not at all. Can each school contact me or comment on this post and tell me how their school deals with transcripts? Do you all have to pay? This information will be helpful for me because UMBC student leaders are initiating efforts to either reduce or eliminate this $8 fee. Thanks!
9.06.2008
Report to the USM Student Council
The USM Student Council is set to meet Sunday September 7 at USM Headquarters. The meeting agenda includes:
- elections of 2008-2009 officers
- a legislative update from Andy Clark
- a presentation from Rachel Fauber of the Maryland Student Climate Coalition
- discussion of the Amethyst Initiative
- discussion of the Slots Referendum
- role of the USM Student Council
As the student regent, I provide a written report each month. Please review and your convenience and contact me with any questions you may have.
- elections of 2008-2009 officers
- a legislative update from Andy Clark
- a presentation from Rachel Fauber of the Maryland Student Climate Coalition
- discussion of the Amethyst Initiative
- discussion of the Slots Referendum
- role of the USM Student Council
As the student regent, I provide a written report each month. Please review and your convenience and contact me with any questions you may have.
9.05.2008
My Op-Ed in The Sun on Md. State Institutions
The Sun published an op-ed piece of mine today titled "Maryland universities offer an ideal path to success" in response to a claim in a Sun editorial last week that those of us who chose an in-state school "settled" on our choice.
Why did you choose your school? How have you found the quality of your education?
Why did you choose your school? How have you found the quality of your education?
Voting for College Students: Get the Facts Straight
Inside HigherEd ran a recent story highlighting tactics used in Montgomery County, Virginia, home of Virginia Tech, to discourage students from registering to vote. In a memo to students, the office of elections stated that students who registered to vote would be changing their permanent residence, and thus have to become independent from their parents for tax and healthcare purposes and would also have to file for a new driver's license. The Obama Campaign has been the lead in voter registration drives on many campuses, including Virginia Tech. They have found that according to a federal law, students can maintain dependent status will residing away from home. They also have contacted leading healthcare institutions to inquire whether students would be dropped from health plans if they registered to vote in another state. Each provider explained that students would not be dropped from their parent's plans.
While such a case has not occurred (yet) in Maryland, this issue in Virginia raises significant questions for us as students in Maryland. The important thing is that you register to vote somewhere and exercise your right to do so. Below are a few links that will be useful for you to register to vote and to find out more information (thanks for UMBC SGA Advisor David Hoffman for providing some of this information):
While such a case has not occurred (yet) in Maryland, this issue in Virginia raises significant questions for us as students in Maryland. The important thing is that you register to vote somewhere and exercise your right to do so. Below are a few links that will be useful for you to register to vote and to find out more information (thanks for UMBC SGA Advisor David Hoffman for providing some of this information):
Maryland Voter Registration Application Form (last day to register in Maryland to vote in the general election is Tuesday, October 14, 2008).
Maryland Absentee Ballot Information and Application (last day to request an absentee ballot in Maryland for the general election is Tuesday, October 28, 2008).
National Voter Registration Form (works for all states except North Dakota, Wyoming, New Hampshire)
Information about all states' election deadlines (from Rock the Vote)
Contact information for all states' election offices (from Rock the Vote)
Maryland State Board of Elections (Phone- 410-269-284; info@elections.state.md.us)
If you have more questions or concerns, please email me and I will help you get your question answered.
Power to the people! Vote!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
