Cuts proposed in the House, debate over tuition freeze

The subcommittee on Education of the House Appropriations Committee voted last week to cut the USM Budget another $20.3 million as part of an effort to balance the state budget.  Of the $20.3 million, $10 million will come from the base operating budget (meaning a carry-over cut in years out) and $10.3 from the fund balance, meaning a one-time cut from the USM's savings that are used to sure up bonds for buildings.

The Governor proposed in his budget this year to increase funding for higher education by $27 million, $16.9 million dedicated to supporting a fourth straight tuition freeze for undergraduate students.  The increases, together, would both maintain quality and increase affordability by holding down the cost of tuition for students. 

Yet, after cutting $20.1 million from the budget, House officials still feel that the USM should hold the line on tuition.  Subcommittee Chair Delegate John Bohanan said, 

I would hope and doubt that the impact would result in a tuition hike for students...In the end, higher education is going to fare extremely well.

In the Governor's original budget, the tuition freeze support funding is listed as a separate line-item.  Delegates left this language in, assuming that the designation would ensure that the money would actually be used to hold tuition.

USM Chancellor Brit Kirwan expressed that this was not the case, and that with general fund dollars cut, that the tuition freeze dollars would then simply fill the whole of depleted funds.  The Board of generally only supported "funded" tuition freezes, of which the house proposal would not be.

I personally am opposed to the concept of an "unfunded" tuition freeze, as is the case in the House version of the budget.  Fortunately, the Board of Regents sets tuition policies, partially removing the decision from political pressures.  Chancellor Kirwan has highlighted that higher education in Maryland appreciates all the support and recognizes the need to cut the budget during the tough ficsal times--but not at the cost of major deficiences in quality.  

While the House version is far from the final proposal, the move to institute an "unfunded" tuition freeze from legislators is concerning.  With strapped universities, quality erodes.  Class sizes grow, faculty are overloaded, library resources remain stagnant, campus hours shorten, other fees arise, among other indicators.  A moderate tuition increase is an appropriate compromise if the state cannot fund the USM budget to the appropriate level.

But, in the meantime, the Senate is still in the process of developing its budget proposal.  Traditionally, the Senate is a bit more liberal in supporting higher education.  I have met with both the Chair of Budget and Taxation, Senator Currie, and the Chair of the Education subcommittee, Senate Kasemeyer, who both said to me that they plan to provide full funding for a tuition freeze.  So, we continue to share our concerns and thoughts with members in the Senate.  Once the Senate has a budget proposal, the House and Senate will meet in conference committee to work out details.

Check out articles highlighting developments:

- in The Sun

- in The Diamondback

- in The Chronicle of Higher Education

Testimony on House Bill 85

I testified on Tuesday as part of a panel of USM student leaders expressing support with amendments to House Bill 85.  The USM Student Council voted unanimously (10-0) at its 2/9 meeting to only support the bill with substantial amendments. Panel members included:

• Bill Logan, Towson undergraduate, Chair of USM Student Council
  
• Brady Walker, University of Baltimore law, Vice Chair of USM Student Council
  
• Sarah Elfreth, Towson undergraduate, Towson SGA and 2009-2010 USM Student Regent
  
• Roberto Munster, UMCP graduate, UMCP Graduate Student Government and USM Student Council member
  

Our testimony highlighted a number of additions and concerns, addressing concerns of costly administrative burdens, publication of unconfirmed information, limitations on academic freedom, an possible unintended consequences.  We submitted an amended version for review (email me at joshmichael@umbc.edu for a full tracked-changes version).

House members were receptive to comments, and Delegate Craig Rice is willing to carve up the bill to avoid the explained unintended consequences.

The Diamondback covered the event, highlighting the potential increased costs for students, resulting from the proscriptive language.  An editorial  was also published today.

USMSC Leadership Transition

The University System of Maryland Student Council (USMSC) met on Sunday at UMES.  One of the main agenda items was mid-year elections to replace David Walker from Bowie State, who resigned as Chair.

Bill Logan, a senior at Towson, was elected to serve as Chair for the remainder of the year.  He can be contacted at wlogan1@towson.edu.  In the remainder of the term, Bill hopes to ensure a successful transition to the new Council and also hopes to represent students within the USM and in Annapolis during the legislative session.

USMSC Meeting, November 16

The USM Student Council met yesterday at Towson to discuss a number of issues. Here is a link to my report to the Council.

The Council discussed a number of issues including:

• the impact of decreased state budget revenues on operating budgets for institutions
• efforts to proactively address illegal filesharing on campuses in order to avoid over-regulation by the federal government and/or music industry
• advocacy/lobbying plan for the Spring session
• Annapolis 101- lobbying day for students with the state legislature

I also asked the Council to research and consider a number of issues:

• differential tuition by discipline
• differential tuition increases/decreases for each institution
• mid-year tuition increases
• mandatory healthcare
• in-state tuition for undocumented immigrants

The Council will meet next at UMBC on December 7 to consider candidates for student regent.

Former USM student leader elected to prominent state role

Former USM Student Council Chair, Brian Bailey (UMBC '07), was recently elected to serve as the Chairman of the Baltimore County Democratic Party. Brian will serve as Chairman of the party for the remaining two years of the 2006-2010 term.

Brian had a celebrated tenure at UMBC and with student leadership in Maryland. He served as the Director of Community and Governmental Affairs for the UMBC SGA for three years, the Vice Chair of the USM Student Council (2005-2006), and as the Chair of the USM Student Council (2006-2007). He also interned as a lobbyist for Capitol Strategies, LLC. Additionally, he was heavily involved in Paula Hollinger's Campaign for Congress, District 3.

Expect to see Brian's name in coming years in decades in the forefront of Maryland politics...

Student Response to Slots

Students across the USM are responding in a variety of ways to representative student groups taking positions on Referendum Question 2 on the Maryland ballot authorizing slots.

• The Towson Towerlight highlighted student discontent from the Black Student Union and other groups in a recent article.
• The Diamondback highlighted in an article today the inaction, despite action by other student groups, of the UMCP SGA.
• The Retriever Weekly highlighted the SGA's action in an article and opinion piece.
  
• The UMBCUnderground Blog discussed the SGA's position a few days ago in a post discussion 
• The USM Student Council endorsed the referendum (6-1-4) in a letter to Chancellor Kirwan.

In general, student groups have been split, about 2/3 in support, and 1/3 in opposition.  Many have felt uneasy supporting a position either way and would have preferred to take no position (as did UMCP SGA).  Others felt a strong obligation to take a stand.

Has any of this impacted your vote on question 2?

USM Student Council Meeting 10/12 Meeting

The USM Student Council met Sunday 10/12. Council members considered a number of issues. Here is also my report, highlighting a number of pressing issues. Here is a highlight of the meeting:

• Election of Officers- David Walker (Bowie), Chair; Brady Walker (UB), Vice Chair; Scarlett Corso (UB) Secretary/Treasurer
• The Council discussed whether or not to take a position on the slots referendum, and ended up supporting the initiative 6-1-4. Leadership will draft a letter to the Chancellor to express the opinion of students.
• Brady Walker (UB) plans to develop a "platform" for the Council on various issues to enhance advocacy efforts.
• Michael Castello (UMBC) is working with Don Spicer and Andy Clark from the USM to proactively address issues on filesharing.
• The Council discussed issues of diversity and plans to research how campuses address diversity conflicts and what resources are available for students.
  

Here is a brief excerpt from my report, highlighting the current fiscal position for higher education in Maryland:

The Governor will propose mid-year budgets cuts (FY09) to higher education to the Board of Public Works this coming Wednesday, October 15. The Sun reported that cuts might amount to $30 million, with $10 million from the operating budget and $20 million from the general fund balance. The Governor aims to cut $423 million from this year’s budget on Wednesday to make up for lower than expected tax revenues. This cut could expand before Wednesday, and we might very well see more mid-year budget cuts down the line in FY09. The decision on the slots referendum will likely impact the Governor’s cuts in coming months.

Planning for the FY10 operating budget has begun. The Department of Budget and Management has planned for a 6.4% increase in state fund support and a 4% increase in tuition. These numbers will undoubtedly change in coming months as policymakers get a better handle of projected tax revenues.

Please post any comments or questions and I will be sure that I find you the answer.

USM Student Council Endorses Slots Referendum

The USMSC voted yesterday to endorse the slots referendum by a vote of 6-1-4. Each institution has one vote, and all voting institutions were represented. Representatives discussed for a good while whether or not the Council should take a position on the referendum. A number of institutions, including UB, UMB, UMBC, and Towson, had spoken at length with institution-based student governments and expressed those viewpoints at the meeting. Other student representatives relied on informal conversations with students on campus.

The USMSC Leadership will communicate the opinion of the Council in a letter by next week.

Towson SGA Endorses Slots

The Towson SGA endorsed the slots referendum Tuesday night. The Towson Towerlight covered the decision in an article today. The Towerlight also published an Op-Ed piece speaking out against the decision.

I had the opportunity to attend the SGA meeting and was impressed by the discourse of the SGA. The final vote was 17-8. The USM Student Council will consider a similar resolution this coming weekend.

USMSC - First Impressions

Like Brian, Sunday was my first experience attending a USMSC meeting. I'd had the opportunity to hear a lot of the news from my fellow UMBC students who were involved in the council last year, so it was exciting to be a part of it myself. It's refreshing to be a part of a group of students from across the state who care about continuing to improve our higher education system.

There are a number of important issues that we are going to be making decisions about in the next few months. Most of the technical details have already been posted here by Josh, so I'd like to talk a bit about the directions I think the council should go.

The issue of slot machines in Maryland has been controversial for years. This November, we'll be voting on a constitutional amendment to allow their placement in several specific locations across the state. Some of the money earned from the slots will be diverted to support higher education. While passing this agenda item via constitutional amendment seems a little extreme, I am in favor of the idea. Currently Maryland residents who wish to gamble this way are forced to travel to other nearby states to do so, bringing their dollars with them. I'd like to see that money be kept in-state, especially when we can use the income to support things like higher education. We might even be able to attract residents from other states to spend their money here, especially at races like Preakness. The bottom line for me is that if people want to gamble, they will - if not here, then with our neighbor states. Instead of funneling that money to them, let's keep it here and use it for worthy causes.

The issue of lowering the drinking age has gotten a bit misinterpreted. What Brit Kirwan and others are supporting is honest, scientific discussion on drinking age limitations and their effectiveness at preventing alcohol-related problems in young adults. We all have our personal opinions on which way the law should go, but the truth is that the only way to settle the discussion is with research. Let's bring some science to this argument in the hope of moving forward in a knowledgeable manner.

It's going to be an exciting year - I'm looking forward to it!

Board of Regents endorses Slots

This past friday at the first full meeting Board of Regents for this academic year, other Regents and I voted to endorse the slots referendum to appear on the ballot in November. The USM Student Council also discussed the issue at length at its meeting yesterday. I voted to endorse the plan becuase I believe that potential societal costs are outweighed by the benefit for higher education. The revenues from slots, which I presume will amount to about $400 million a year, will be dedicated to a fund for education. Up to $150 million of this fund can be dedicated to higher education capital projects each year.

In light of these developments, I have pulled together some resources for you that will be useful in considering the issue:

Non-Technical Bill Summary
Copy of Legislation passed by Maryland General Assembly (description of locations included)
Ballot Language

(Chapter 5, Acts of 2007 Special Session)

Authorizing Video Lottery Terminals (Slot Machines) to Fund Education

Authorizes the State to issue up to five video lottery licenses for the purpose of raising revenue for education of children in public schools, prekindergarten through grade 12, public school construction and improvements, and construction of capital projects at community colleges and higher education institutions. No more than a total number of 15,000 video lottery terminals may be authorized in the State, and only one license may be issued for each specified location in Anne Arundel, Cecil, Worcester, and Allegany Counties, and Baltimore City. Any additional forms or expansion of commercial gaming in Maryland is prohibited, unless approved by a voter referendum.

(Enacts new Article XIX of the Maryland Constitution)

• For the Constitutional Amendment
• Against the Constitutional Amendment

Also, here are some other links that might be useful for you:
Marylanders United to Stop Slots
For Maryland- Pro Slots Advocacy Group
Sun Article on BOR Endorsement of Slots


What are you thoughts on slots in Maryland? Do you think the benefits for higher education make the proposal worthwhile?

Report to the USM Student Council

The USM Student Council is set to meet Sunday September 7 at USM Headquarters. The meeting agenda includes:
- elections of 2008-2009 officers
- a legislative update from Andy Clark
- a presentation from Rachel Fauber of the Maryland Student Climate Coalition
- discussion of the Amethyst Initiative
- discussion of the Slots Referendum
- role of the USM Student Council

As the student regent, I provide a written report each month. Please review and your convenience and contact me with any questions you may have.