Should we not question the actual expenditure by the SGA? Members of the food contract review committee worked hard during the selection process of Chartwells to ensure that student groups could go outside of the on-campus food provider for food at events. In other words, should we be upset with Chartwells because they have high prices, or be upset with the SGA for not looking outside Chartwells? Maybe the price for Chartwells will subside if student groups choose other providers…
While I have raised the issue in this specific case at UMBC, the broader issue addresses whether student groups on campuses actually have the opportunity to pursue competitive alternatives for food contracting. UMBC's previous contract with Sodexho prohibited groups from serving food on campus from outside food providers. Bowie State students are currently participating in a review of their food contract and considering a provision allowing student groups to look outside their food provider for food at events.
What policy exists on your campus? Have you had any experience with ordering food from your on-campus food provider? Other thoughts?
Posts
2 comments:
We have a similar situation at Towson (and also use Chartwells, of course). Student groups are required to get a food waiver from Black and Gold (our catering company) before they get outside food for an event.
One of our SGA senators is currently looking into the problem of charging student groups so much for food when they can get the same (or better) food elsewhere.
Under the previous food contract with Sodexho at UMBC we had to receive a food waiver. This provision was removed from the new contact. Additionally, sources tell me that the consultant the school hired said that practice of requiring a food waiver is something that a majority of campuses across the county do not require them.
I would examine when your food contract is up for review and if it is soon I would lobby your administration to remove this provision.
Post a Comment