As students who are directly affected by the cost of tuition, we believe it is important to explain why a fourth straight tuition freeze for resident undergraduate students at our public universities is so important for Maryland.
Even with tuition frozen for three years, student costs have increased. Since 2005, mandatory fees for students (for parking, student unions and recreation services) have increased 15 percent; room, by 14 percent; and board, by 13 percent at the University of Maryland, College Park. Couple these increases with the rising costs of textbooks (increasing at four times the rate of inflation), transportation and other associated costs, and an in-state student's annual bill can reach more than $20,000.
Most students in the University System of Maryland are not wealthy. Our parents are teachers, government workers, nurses and police officers. This economic crisis has hit our families hard, and we need any financial break we can get to continue pursuing a college degree - which will better position us to contribute to Maryland's vibrant, knowledge-based economy.
We need a tuition freeze to help keep costs affordable so that we can stay enrolled. Maryland is witnessing an amazing transformation in public higher education. New facilities are being built on campuses across the state, and academic standards continue to rise. The state's public universities are ranked among the nation's best and are educating more students than ever. At the same time, our classes are more racially and socioeconomically diverse than previous classes.
2.23.2009
Take Action! Textbooks
Tuition freeze right move for Maryland's future
Continuing the tuition freeze will not hinder this growth at all. To the contrary, it will help open doors for more Marylanders to share the outstanding opportunity of attending a public university. The proposed freeze would cost the state $16 million, a small fraction of the more than $1 billion in state investment in higher education each year.
"Governing is choosing," and Gov. Martin O'Malley has chosen to invest in Maryland's future, so that we can fill the jobs of our state's advancing economy. This is a long-term, worthwhile strategy for investing in the minds needed for Maryland's future success.
Jonathan Sachs is Student Government Association president at the University of Maryland, College Park. Josh Michael is a student member of the University System of Maryland Board of Regents and a UMBC student.
2.22.2009
Tuition Freeze becoming a reality
President Caret in the spotlight
2.21.2009
Tuition Freeze: Keeping it in Perspective
The sound bite of "tuition freeze" does not do justice to the full policy. It describes the tuition revenues with out the accompanying state revenues. Some tuition freezes are really tuition subsidies, in which the state covers the bill for increased tuition for in-state, undergraduate students. Others are true caps on tuition without state subsidy support, decreasing the real revenue for the university (adjusted for inflation). So,a funded tuition freeze is like an across-the-board scholarship for students from the state. An unfunded tuition freeze is like the BGE cap on electricity rates. The result in the latter scenario is large increases when the cap comes off.
In Maryland, we have experienced three tuition freezes and are expecting a fourth. The first, under the Ehrlich Administration, is characterized as an "unfunded" tuition freeze. The latter two and proposed fourth, under the O'Malley Administration, are considered funded tuition freezes. I support funded tuition freezes, and don't support unfunded freezes. In response to critics who describe the waste in higher education, I highlight the Effectiveness and Efficiency Initiative , which has derived cost savings for the USM of 1 to 2 % of the budget. The tuition subsidy proposed in the FY2010 budget amounts to $16.9 million. The USM Board of Regents has established an arrangement with the Governor that he must "buy" tuition freezes up and above the proposed operating budget allocations.
I had the opportunity to talk with a reporter from The State News, the Michigan State University independent newspaper regarding the tuition freeze policy in Maryland. I described the policy in Maryland, and also cautioned about the possible negative impacts of suffering quality that can derive from artificial revenue caps. Check out the article to see for yourself.
I am often found defending the policy under its current merits, and rarely explain the caveats of which I include in my position. I support funded tuition freezes, but only if not at the cost of decreasing quality.
2.20.2009
The Sun: More Maryland families choosing USM institutions
2.19.2009
Testimony on House Bill 85
- Bill Logan, Towson undergraduate, Chair of USM Student Council
- Brady Walker, University of Baltimore law, Vice Chair of USM Student Council
- Sarah Elfreth, Towson undergraduate, Towson SGA and 2009-2010 USM Student Regent
- Roberto Munster, UMCP graduate, UMCP Graduate Student Government and USM Student Council member
2.14.2009
USM Passes Policy on Textbook Affordability Measures
2.13.2009
Board of Regents set to approve Textbook Policy
The Board of Regents will consider the proposed "Policy on Textbook Affordability Measures" at tomorrow's full Board meeting at Towson University. The effort stems from the Textbook Affordability Summit held on November 24th by the USM. The policy includes a number of provisions, that when coupled with the federal law addressing textbooks, will significantly decrease the cost for students.
- students recieve ISBN numbers and other information regarding textbook selections well in advance of the beginning of the semester to ensure that students can shop competitively outside the bookstore
- deadlines for book finalization are set prior to the conclusion of classes in order to maximize the book buy-back process
- best practices for faculty regarding new editions of textbooks and bundling
- faculty can allow students to purchase older editions of an assigned book of the content is of relevant educational content
- bookstores stock both unbundled and bundled versions of materials
- students have the opportunity to review the use of course materails through final course evaluations
- faculty are educated of the policy each semester.

